General Law of Administrative Responsibilities


    General Law of Administrative Responsibilities

    The General Law of Administrative Responsibilities (‘GLAR’) establishes administrative penalties for acts of corruption and bribery by public officials and private persons that are considered linked to such offences.

    Last Updated: July 30, 2019

  • Requirements

    Acts by private persons that are considered linked to serious administrative offences include: 

    • bribery of a public official, whether directly or through third parties (Articles 52 and 66 of the GLAR;) 
    • participation in federal, state, or municipal administrative proceedings from which the person has been banned (Article 67 of the GLAR); 
    • use of economic or political power on a public servant to obtain a benefit or advantage, or to cause injury to any other person or public official (Article 68 of the GLAR); 
    • use of false or altered documentation or information with the purpose of obtaining an authorisation, benefit or advantage or to cause harm to any other person (Article 69 of the GLAR); 
    • collusion with one or more private parties to obtain improper benefits or advantages in federal, state, or municipal public contracting processes (Article 70 of the GLAR); and 
    • hiring of public servants that were in office the previous year, and that haveas part of their previous employmentacquired confidential information, that may be used by the hiring party to obtain a benefit in the market or to gain an advantageous position over their competitors (Article 72 of the GLAR).

    Article 81 of the GLAR establishes administrative penalties that may be imposed on physical persons and legal entities for administrative offenses. For legal entities, these penalties include: 

    • economic sanctions that may reach up two times the benefit obtained, or up to approximately MXN 126,750,000 (approx. €5,945,830); 
    • preclusion from participating in public procurement and projects for up to ten years; 
    • suspension of activities for a period of up to three years; 
    • dissolution of the entity; and 
    • liability for damages incurred by any affected public entities or governments. 
  • How OneTrust Helps

    OneTrustVendorpedia simplifies third-party risk management by combining automation with aggregated vendor research to streamline the vendor engagement lifecycle, from onboarding to offboarding. The platform helps organizations conduct faster and more in-depth security and privacy reviews. 

    Vendorpedia is backed by the world’s largest and most up-to-date database of privacy and security laws, frameworks, and standards, which directly power and enrich OneTrustVendorpedia. Research is generated by 30 in-house security and privacy experts and a network of 500 lawyers across 300 jurisdictions. 

    For additional details on Vendorpedia, read more here.

Want to learn more? Login to the full DataGuidance platform.

About OneTrust

OneTrust is the #1 most widely used privacy, security and third-party risk technology platform trusted by more than 3,000 companies to comply with the CCPA, GDPR, ISO27001 and hundreds of the world’s privacy and security laws. OneTrust's three primary offerings include OneTrust Privacy Management Software, OneTrust PreferenceChoice™ consent and preference management software, and OneTrust Vendorpedia™ third-party risk management software and vendor risk exchange. To learn more, visit or connect on LinkedIn, Twitter and Facebook.